La Liga have issued an announcement welcoming the choice made by the Industrial Court docket No. 10 in Barcelona, which till June 30, 2025.
Following the listening to on Monday, the decide gave his ruling earlier immediately and it went in opposition to Barça, who had been hoping to obtain approval to register the Spaniard by way of a precautionary measure like they did with Gavi again in 2023.
So far as La Liga is worried, they’ve issued an announcement supporting the choice as they imagine “not one of the vital situations for adopting the precautionary measure are met.”
Recapping the conclusions of Decide Ignacio Fernandez de Senespleda’s ruling, La Liga said:
“The ruling defends the complete legality of the choice to disclaim the registration of a participant based mostly on the appliance of article 77 of the Funds Preparation Guidelines of La Liga (NEP), below which, within the case of a long-term damage, golf equipment could substitute a participant with one other.
“La Liga has made a motivated interpretation of article 77 of the NEP. Extra importantly, it’s the similar interpretation that has been utilized to all the opposite groups within the competitors. It’s even the identical interpretation that was utilized to FC Barcelona in July 2024 within the instances of Araujo and Inigo Martinez.”
The ruling additionally emphasised that: “The aim of authorising the surplus spending is to make sure that a long-term damage doesn’t diminish the competitors of the workforce, to not enable long-term accidents to facilitate the registration of gamers whose salaries exceed the restrict, as FC Barcelona seeks to do.”
Moreover, La Liga reminded that, because the ruling itself acknowledges, the choice to not register Olmo had already been made by the La Liga Funds Validation Physique.
Moreover it was subsequently confirmed thrice: by the Financial Management Committee and the Social Committee of La Liga Assets, in addition to by the UEFA Licensing Second Occasion Committee of the RFEF.”
For all these causes, “La Liga celebrates that, within the face of requests for precautionary measures of this nature, the appliance of a provision of the NEP that has been uniformly utilized to all golf equipment has not been excluded, thus stopping severe alteration of the aggressive steadiness of the foundations.”
Supply:
