There was controversy within the Southampton vs Liverpool on Sunday as main questions have been requested surrounding the awarding of the Saints’ penalty.
The Reds got here into the match at St Mary’s seeking to put eight factors between themselves and Man Metropolis on the high of the Premier League after Pep Guardiola’s crew suffered a shock 4-0 defeat to Tottenham on Saturday.
Arne Slot’s males have made an unimaginable begin to the 2024/25 marketing campaign and that continued in the course of the opening half-hour of their conflict with Southampton as .
That might not final very lengthy as Southampton would discover an equaliser simply 12 minutes later. The Saints’ purpose got here in controversial vogue as there have been numerous questions concerning the awarding of the penalty
Andy Robertson –– introduced down Tyler Dibling because the teen ran in direction of the Liverpool field and it resulted in referee Samuel Barrott pointing in direction of the spot.
Upon nearer inspection, it regarded just like the however the VAR crew couldn’t see sufficient proof to overturn the onfield choice.
The proof appears fairly clear, which has left many followers and pundits questioning the controversial choice.
Controversial choice might have price Liverpool the Premier League title
Southampton would go on to take the lead within the match early within the second half earlier than the Reds would make it 3-2 following a Mohamed Salah double Though the choice didn’t price Slot’s crew factors ultimately, it might have been very important on the finish of the season if the Premier League title race may be very tight and it’s extra proof that the officiating in England’s high flight wants enhancing.
Evidently the VAR groups are afraid to overturn on-field choices and though that ought to take priority, conditions like this are very clear and the person within the center ought to be informed to have a second take a look at his name.
This comes after a nasty few weeks for the PGMOL and it will likely be attention-grabbing to see additional response to this controversial choice.
