A consultant from Italian referees defined their official views on the controversial VAR incidents in Como-Juventus, Empoli-Milan and Torino-Genoa, confirming one error was made.
As per each Sunday night, DAZN have their Open VAR present the place the footage from the Video Assistant Referees is proven and mentioned within the studio with a member of the Referees Affiliation (AIA).
This time it was Elenito Liberatore, who had loads of conditions to cowl after a really controversial set of Serie A video games, particularly ones performed on Saturday.
The primary was the penalty Como wished within the closing minutes of their defeat to Juventus
“That is completely not a punishable dealing with offence, so the fitting determination was to not award a penalty,”
“Gatti was difficult for the house and in that context touched the ball in fortuitous vogue, so it’s not punishable.”
There gave the impression to be some debate even inside the VAR sales space between the 2 officers who had been evaluating the footage, as whereas one insisted the contact “took management away” from the Como striker, the opposite assured it was all a part of the “pure dynamics” of the motion.
That dialogue continued within the DAZN studio, the place the opposite pundits like Valon Behrami argued this should be a penalty as a result of Gatti together with his fingertips pushed the ball off the chest of Douvikas when he was clear on purpose.
“Clearly there are handballs which are punishable and others that aren’t punishable. This has been differentiated lately as a result of it’s not proper to penalise a participant whose solely fault is contending the house with an opponent,” replied Di Liberatore.
The problem many have with this variation of rule is that if there may be any handball – even whether it is clearly unintentional – immediately resulting in a purpose, then that can be disallowed.
Nonetheless, the participant defending is given the advantage of particular analysis on a case by case foundation, which inevitably can result in a scarcity of consistency.
VAR analysis of Milan and Torino complaints
Di Liberatore was additionally confirmed , particularly the Liberato Cacace studs-up deal with that caught Kyle Walker on the facet of the shin throughout Empoli vs. Milan.
Whereas the referee waved play on and didn’t even give a yellow card, the VAR determined it was inadequate to warrant an On-Subject Overview for a straight pink.
“It’s appropriate for the VAR to not intervene as a result of there was a scarcity of depth,” defined Di Liberatore.
“A yellow card would’ve been an accurate determination.”
There was extra controversy in that match, however on this case it was right down to the VAR protocol.
Fikayo Tomori acquired a second yellow card for a foul on a participant who was visibly offside, however because the flag didn’t go up, VAR couldn’t intervene to appropriate the error.
“If it had been a straight pink card, then sure the VAR may’ve taken motion, however because it was a second yellow then the VAR is minimize out of the entire state of affairs,” added Di Liberatore.
It isn’t the primary time that the protocol has raised a number of eyebrows for its lack of ability to get entangled when a second yellow does nonetheless cut back a group to 10 males and relies on a transparent and apparent error.
Will there be recommendations to alter the protocol in future?
“As of immediately, these are the principles and we’re obliged to observe them. There may be discussing within the IFAB yearly to enhance the whole lot that we will, step-by-step.”
Torino had been livid when Antonio Sanabria had his shirt pulled by Stefano Sabelli within the
This footage was additionally performed with the dialogue within the VAR sales space, who famous Sanabria “was going backwards anyway and the jersey is tugged, however not an incredible deal.”
Was this the fitting determination?
“It was an error from the referee and the VAR,” confessed Di Liberatore.
“We might’ve most popular an On-Subject Overview and should admit when errors are made.”